Mr. Harper’s
Promise to Firearms Owners
In a letter dated 15 December
2006, Garry Breitkreuz, MP, CPC wrote:
We have been
united in our 12-year fight to repeal Bill C-68. I
will never give up and I hope you will stay with us until it [The Firearms
Act] is dead and gone.
I leave you with the promise
then leadership candidate Stephen Harper made to us all in January 2002:
I [Mr. Harper] was and
still am in total agreement with the statement made in the House of
Commons by former Reform Leader Preston Manning on 13 June 1995:
Bill C-68,
if passed into law will not be a good law. It will be a blight on
the legislative record of the government, a law that fails the three
great tests of constitutionality, of effectiveness and of democratic
consent to f the governed. What should be the fate of a bad a law?
It should be repealed ... .’
Bill C-68
[The Firearms Act] has proven to be a bad law and has created a bureaucratic
nightmare for both gun owners and the government. As Leader of the Official
Opposition, I will use all powers afforded
to me as Leader and continue our party’s fight to repeal Bill
C-68 and replace it with a firearms control system that is cost effective
and respects the rights of Canadians to own and use firearms responsibly.
Rest assured Garry Breitkreuz
will never betray the firearms community.
The Promise of the Conservatives while Serving as the Loyal Opposition
“There is only one
to fix this mess and that is to elect a Conservative government. We
promise to repeal Bill C-68 and return the gun laws to the way they
were before 1995. Then I personally promise that I will
start the task of fixing all the flaws in federal firearm laws by requiring
that they be subjected to a public safety test administered by the Auditor
General of Canada. My proposal includes a sunset clause on all gun control
laws that have been proven by the Auditor General not to be cost effective
at reducing the criminal use of firearms and improving public safety.”
Garry Breitkreuz, M.P. Yorkton-Melville
(SK)
Conservative Firearms Critic
House of Commons
08 July 2005
|